Free Blog Counter

Monday, March 09, 2009

NTU: You stab me or I stab you?

Every time i see a report in regards to the "stabbing" incident in NTU, i feel totally disgusted. Allegations which are made based on imaginations are constantly used against the poor student who died in the tragic incident. The student, known as David, has been accused of stabbing his professor and later on fell to his death in a suicide attempt.

Let us go through the facts one by one. *Note that all the information here are taken from various internet sources. Who knows? They might be all lying. But hundreds against a single statement from the media? The odds is definitely for the internet sources*

1) Cut on the wrist
This has been confirmed to be a false piece of information. David's parents claimed that there are no cuts on the wrist of David. So it means that the one providing this piece of information is telling a lie. Providing a false statement in an attempt to disrupt investigation? Should the one who has provided this piece of fake information be jailed? Food for thought.

2) Who stabbed who?
Is there any evidence that David stabbed his professor? NO. Those who believed that David stabbed his own professor even up till this moment must have IQ of less than 80. There isn't any evidence showing that David stabbed his professor up until now, unless i am so dumb to miss out on any important news. So why does the media portrayed this in the first place?

Simply because, a dead man tells no tale. But think back. David's parents are not allowed to have a look at the whole of David's body. Why is that so? Even if there is a law supporting this action, what is the law trying to achieve? Making room for "moderation"?

The professor was released from the hospital shortly after his admission. Do you think a deep stab on the back can be treated so quickly? Most likely, the stab on the back, if there is even one in the first place, is VERY MINOR. Do you think a person who is bent on killing his professor can only manage a shallow stab in a surprise attack filled with hatred? Even if the stab is deep, do you think the professor has the ability to retaliate to the point where David is so badly cut? Even out of self defence, without wielding a weapon, how can Professor managed to cause so much damage just be defending himself? Is David so clumsy as to cut himself so much in a murder attempt? Cuts on neck? This is funny.

Try holding a pen and put your hand behind your back with the pen pointing towards your back. How hard can you stab yourself in the back in such an awkward position?

Up until now, the discussions is only about David stabbing the prof due to stress or prof stabbing David in an attempt to take over his FYP. I personally feel that this is unfair judgment. Why only limit yourself to 2 possibilities when in fact, there are 4?

Based on the fact that the stab is most probably shallow and it was a surprise attack on David's part, below are the four possibilities each with different probabilities.

a) David stabbed Prof
b) Prof stabbed David
*c) David stabbed himself
*d) Prof stabbed himself

I will stop here, go figure it out yourself.

Although i still have alot of analysis to put down, i am quite drained at the moment, so this will be it for now.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home